[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020708200228v1af5248cx6f6da4a7a35400f3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:28:09 +0300
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: "Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Daniel Phillips" <phillips@...gle.com>,
"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>,
"Matt Mackall" <mpm@...enic.com>,
"Lee Schermerhorn" <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
"Steve Dickson" <SteveD@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm: slub: add knowledge of reserve pages
Hi Peter,
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 12:12 +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> > Any reason why the callers that are actually interested in this don't do
> > page->reserve on their own?
On 8/20/07, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> because new_slab() destroys the content?
Right. So maybe we could move the initialization parts of new_slab()
to __new_slab() so that the callers that are actually interested in
'reserve' could do allocate_slab(), store page->reserve and do rest of
the initialization with it?
As for the __GFP_WAIT handling, I *think* we can move the interrupt
enable/disable to allocate_slab()... Christoph?
Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists