linux-kernel - Re: Non atomic unaligned writes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:23:07 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, patches@...-64.org,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"S. P. Prasanna" <prasanna@...ibm.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: Non atomic unaligned writes

> Intel486???, Pentium??, or P6 family processors. The P6 family processors
> provide bus control signals that permit external memory subsystems to
> make split accesses atomic; however, nonaligned data accesses will

Normally in standard SMP systems between CPUs they are atomic AFAIK 
(modulo bugs) 

You're right -- i'm not sure about P5 SMP.

> seriously impact the performance of the processor and should be avoided
> where possible.

But they're also slow yes.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/