linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46CCB088.8070606@goop.org>
Date:	Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:54:16 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt

Zachary Amsden wrote:
> This patch provides hypercalls for the i386 port I/O instructions,
> which vastly helps guests which use native-style drivers.  For certain
> VMI workloads, this provides a performance boost of up to 30%.  We
> expect KVM and lguest to be able to achieve similar gains on I/O
> intensive workloads.

Two comments:

- I should dust off my "break up paravirt_ops" patch, and this would fit
nicely into it (I think we already discussed this)

- What happens if you *don't* want to pv some of the io instructions? 
What if you have a device which is directly exposed to the guest?

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/