[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46CCB56F.8090308@superbug.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:15:11 +0100
From: James Courtier-Dutton <James@...erbug.co.uk>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Zachary Amsden wrote:
>> This patch provides hypercalls for the i386 port I/O instructions,
>> which vastly helps guests which use native-style drivers. For certain
>> VMI workloads, this provides a performance boost of up to 30%. We
>> expect KVM and lguest to be able to achieve similar gains on I/O
>> intensive workloads.
>
> Two comments:
>
> - I should dust off my "break up paravirt_ops" patch, and this would fit
> nicely into it (I think we already discussed this)
>
> - What happens if you *don't* want to pv some of the io instructions?
> What if you have a device which is directly exposed to the guest?
If one could directly expose a device to the guest, this feature could
be extremely useful for me.
Is it possible? How would it manage to handle the DMA bus mastering?
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists