[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070822060713.GA1684@ff.dom.local>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:07:13 +0200
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <cw@...f.org>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com>,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@...il.com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
len.brown@...el.com
Subject: Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 02:08:33AM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >>>How many people e.g. test -rc kernels compiled with gcc 3.2?
I confirm gcc version:
~/src/linux-2.6.23-rc3$ gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-slackware-linux/3.2.3/specs
Configured with: ../gcc-3.2.3/configure --prefix=/usr --enable-shared
--enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-checkingi
--with-gnu-ld --verbose --target=i486-slackware-linux
--host=i486-slackware-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.2.3
glibc-2.3.2
Sorry, you have to guess this, but, after reporting long time ago some
acpi make warnings, I didn't even suspect anybody would be interested
more this time...
It's an old box with Slackware 9.1, and this make is the last stage
of testing such a hot kernel version... But, according to README gcc
3.2 seems to be legal. (I hope there would be some warning about gcc
too old, anyway.)
Cheers,
Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists