[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46CBD0F5.2080709@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:00:21 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
Zachary Amsden wrote:
> In general, I/O in a virtual guest is subject to performance problems.
> The I/O can not be completed physically, but must be virtualized. This
> means trapping and decoding port I/O instructions from the guest OS.
> Not only is the trap for a #GP heavyweight, both in the processor and
> the hypervisor (which usually has a complex #GP path), but this forces
> the hypervisor to decode the individual instruction which has faulted.
> Worse, even with hardware assist such as VT, the exit reason alone is
> not sufficient to determine the true nature of the faulting instruction,
> requiring a complex and costly instruction decode and simulation.
>
> This patch provides hypercalls for the i386 port I/O instructions, which
> vastly helps guests which use native-style drivers. For certain VMI
> workloads, this provides a performance boost of up to 30%. We expect
> KVM and lguest to be able to achieve similar gains on I/O intensive
> workloads.
>
What about cost on hardware?
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists