[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200708232129.54612.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:29:54 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 2/2] Let process accouting trust sched_clock.
Currently the scheduler does sanity checking on sched_clock and corrects
the values. Remove some of these checks to make steal time influence the
process time.
This patch is probably nothing for upstream but with this patch the
accouting for s390 seems to work regarding steal time, even without
CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_TIME (as long as CONFIG_VIRT_TIMER is y).
---
kernel/sched.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -3310,19 +3310,13 @@ void account_steal_time(struct task_stru
void scheduler_tick(void)
{
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
struct task_struct *curr = rq->curr;
- u64 next_tick = rq->tick_timestamp + TICK_NSEC;
spin_lock(&rq->lock);
__update_rq_clock(rq);
- /*
- * Let rq->clock advance by at least TICK_NSEC:
- */
- if (unlikely(rq->clock < next_tick))
- rq->clock = next_tick;
rq->tick_timestamp = rq->clock;
update_cpu_load(rq);
if (curr != rq->idle) /* FIXME: needed? */
curr->sched_class->task_tick(rq, curr);
spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists