[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070824104538.GA31344@thunk.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:45:38 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>,
Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Tech Board Discuss
<Tech-board-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ksummit-2007-discuss@...nk.org
Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:55:04PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:52:54PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > The other part of the puzzle is including the wider Linux community.
>
> As I said; what's wrong with just using SPI membership? It's not like
> it is remotely hard for kernel hackers to gain membership in SPI. And
> somebody else takes care of the bureaucracy for you.
Given the huge overlap between SPI membership and Debian membership,
and then taking a look at the craziness that takes place on various
Debian mailing lists, such as but not limited to debian-legal, I'm
quite convinced that this would be a baaaaaad idea.
- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists