linux-kernel - Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 6/6] UML

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070824152127.GA7190@c2.user-mode-linux.org>
Date:	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:21:27 -0400
From:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
To:	Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@...oo.it>
Cc:	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 6/6] UML - Fix hostfs style

On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 04:54:59PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > actually. Personally I'd prefer:
> >
> > 	else
> > 		type = OS_TYPE_DIR;
> 
> I strongly agree with this style; beyond style itself, one strong reason is 
> that joining statements hinder singlestepping through function code (it's 
> easy to run gdb on UML, and anyway kgdb exists).

How does that help?  gdb should stop as easily on a "else foo;" line as on 
	else
		foo;
right?

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/