[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070824155735.GA14978@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:57:35 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>,
Andy Isaacson <adi@...apodia.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Tech Board Discuss
<Tech-board-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ksummit-2007-discuss@...nk.org
Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux
Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:22:28PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:55:04PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:52:54PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > The other part of the puzzle is including the wider Linux community.
> >
> > As I said; what's wrong with just using SPI membership? It's not like
> > it is remotely hard for kernel hackers to gain membership in SPI. And
> > somebody else takes care of the bureaucracy for you.
>
> Ahh, I didn't realize you were suggesting making -them- do the work
> instead of just stealing their model. I suppose that could work,
> provided no one finds being an SPI member objectionable and they'd
> provide us with their member list.
I currently object to becoming an SPI member due to a number of personal
reasons at this point in time.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists