[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070825002349.GB1894@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:23:49 -0700
From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To: travis@....com
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86: fix cpu_to_node references (v2)
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 03:26:55PM -0700, travis@....com wrote:
> Fix four instances where cpu_to_node is referenced
> by array instead of via the cpu_to_node macro. This
> is preparation to moving it to the per_cpu data area.
>
...
> unsigned long __init numa_free_all_bootmem(void)
> --- a/arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c
> +++ b/arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c
> @@ -431,9 +431,9 @@
> setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
>
> for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
> - if (cpu_to_node[i] == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> + if (cpu_to_node(i) == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> continue;
> - if (!node_isset(cpu_to_node[i], node_possible_map))
> + if (!node_isset(cpu_to_node(i), node_possible_map))
> numa_set_node(i, NUMA_NO_NODE);
> }
> numa_init_array();
During this particular routine execution, per cpu areas are not yet setup. In
future, when we make cpu_to_node(i) use per cpu area, then this code will break.
And actually setup_per_cpu_areas() uses cpu_to_node(). So...
thanks,
suresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists