[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070825005017.GC1894@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:50:18 -0700
From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To: travis@....com
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86: Reduce Memory Usage and Inter-Node message traffic (v2)
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 03:26:54PM -0700, travis@....com wrote:
> Previous Intro:
Thanks for doing this.
> In x86_64 and i386 architectures most arrays that are sized
> using NR_CPUS lay in local memory on node 0. Not only will most
> (99%?) of the systems not use all the slots in these arrays,
> particularly when NR_CPUS is increased to accommodate future
> very high cpu count systems, but a number of cache lines are
> passed unnecessarily on the system bus when these arrays are
> referenced by cpus on other nodes.
Can we move cpuinfo_x86 also to per cpu area? Though critical run
time code doesn't access this area, it will be nice to move the cpuinfo_x86
also into per cpu area.
Perhaps the current cpuinfo_x86 layout might cause confusion and make people
add arch specific per cpu elements into cpuinfo_x86(thinking that it uses per
cpu area).
Wonder if this confusion is the reason for git commit f3fa8ebc
thanks,
suresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists