[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200708271049.06900.paul.moore@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:49:06 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
To: Kentaro Takeda <k.takeda26@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, chrisw@...s-sol.org
Subject: Re: [TOMOYO 15/15] LSM expansion for TOMOYO Linux.
On Friday, August 24 2007 8:58:28 am Kentaro Takeda wrote:
> LSM hooks for network accept and recv:
> * socket_post_accept is modified to return int.
This has been discussed several times on various lists and is not considered
an acceptable solution to blocking incoming stream connection attempts.
Please take a look at the existing LSM stream connection request hooks as
well as how SELinux makes use of them.
> * post_recv_datagram is added in skb_recv_datagram.
Can you explain to me why this is not possible using the existing
security_socket_sock_rcv_skb() LSM hook?
--
paul moore
linux security @ hp
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists