[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200708281939.JDH33719.MVSFOOQJHFFOtL@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:39:13 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: paul.moore@...com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, chrisw@...s-sol.org
Subject: Re: [TOMOYO 15/15] LSM expansion for TOMOYO Linux.
Hello.
Paul Moore wrote:
> > * post_recv_datagram is added in skb_recv_datagram.
>
> Can you explain to me why this is not possible using the existing
> security_socket_sock_rcv_skb() LSM hook?
socket_sock_rcv_skb() is a hook for enqueue time.
I want a hook for dequeue time, because what TOMOYO Linux is doing is
not "whether a socket created by foo is permitted to pick up
an incoming packet from specific address/port"
but "whether bar is permitted to pick up
an incoming packet from specific address/port".
At the time of enqueue, I can't know who will pick up that packet.
Same reason for socket_post_accept(). What TOMOYO Linux is doing is
not "whether a socket created by foo is permitted to accept
a connection request from specific address/port"
but "whether bar is permitted to accept
a connection request from specific address/port".
At the time of enqueue, I can't know who will pick up that request.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists