[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6bffcb0e0708270826p7a7fb044re53d0db4094bc3d5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:26:19 +0200
From: "Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>
To: "Daniel Walker" <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Björn Steinbrink" <B.Steinbrink@....de>,
eranian@....hp.com, ak@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Natalie Protasevich" <protasnb@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
On 27/08/07, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 13:38 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > On 27/08/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
[..]
> > > I'm not sure that we need one, really. Any bugs in a stable release can be
> > > handled via email and/or bugzilla as we are presently doing?
> > >
> > > What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just
> > > getting lost. Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting
> > > transitioned into bugzilla for tracking?
> >
> > I can copy all regression reports into Bugzilla after each release.
>
> Should we get the regression field fix before? Or had you planned on
> just bypassing that completely ?
IMO solution proposed by David http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/27/21 seems
to be most reasonable.
>
> Daniel
>
>
Regards,
Michal
--
LOG
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists