[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070827191507.GI21089@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:15:07 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: Gabriel Barazer <gabriel@...va.fr>, nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org,
nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jkar8572@...rs.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: nfs4 filesystem mounted via the "bind" option reports wrong fstype
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 02:40:59PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> There's no reason not to just mount server:/exports/data directly at
> /home/data; the bind mounts are just a workaround for the somewhat
> primitive exports facility on the server side.
Bullshit. Bindings are first-class operations on _client_, regardless
of fs types involved.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists