[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070827193242.GJ3118@fieldses.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:32:42 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Gabriel Barazer <gabriel@...va.fr>, nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org,
nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jkar8572@...rs.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: nfs4 filesystem mounted via the "bind" option reports wrong
fstype
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 08:15:07PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 02:40:59PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>
> > There's no reason not to just mount server:/exports/data directly at
> > /home/data; the bind mounts are just a workaround for the somewhat
> > primitive exports facility on the server side.
>
> Bullshit. Bindings are first-class operations on _client_, regardless
> of fs types involved.
I know. Did I say something to the contrary?
Maybe I was too terse; in more detail: the original poster appears to be
mounting server:/exports/data by first mounting server:/ somewhere and
then bind-mounting the exports/data someplace else. I couldn't see an
obvious reason they'd be using two steps instead of just performing a
single mount of server:/exports/data.
So my assumption was that this was due to a confused memory of some
server-side setup instructions. (On the server side, nfs4 export setup
often requires the administrator to do some extra bind mounts which
shouldn't really be necessary.)
--b.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists