[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708281254070.16473@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...il.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...il.com>,
swin wang <wangswin@...il.com>, totty.lu@...il.com,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, joern@...ybastard.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [00/36] Large Blocksize Support V6
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> one patch per file is the most braindead and most unacceptable way
> to split a series. Please stop whatever you're doing right now and
> correct it and send out a patch that has one patch per logical change
> for the whole tree. This means people can actually read the patch,
> and it's bisectable.
The patches are per logical change aside from the first patches that
introduce the page cache functions all over the kernel. It would be
unacceptably big and difficult to merge if I put them all together.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists