linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] debloat aic7xxx and aic79xx drivers by deinlining

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200708282055.07411.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Date:	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 20:55:06 +0100
From:	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	hare@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debloat aic7xxx and aic79xx drivers by deinlining

On Tuesday 28 August 2007 16:17, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:56:34 +010
>
> Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com> wrote:
> > >   make namespacecheck
> >
> > Thanks, nice tool.
> >
> > aic7xxx is kind of not very nice in this regard.
> >
> > See below what I get even on non-patched driver.
> >
> > I am willing to clean it up, but I still would like
> > "debloating" patch to be accepted.
>
> Fwiw I do like your debloat patch a lot; it's just only half the
> equation ... if you also do the namespace fixes, I bet the driver
> debloats even more...

Yes, I know, and I am happy to do that too. I just don't know
whether patches will be accepted.

Why this patch is not commented on by scsi people?
Am I sending patches to wrong people/lists?
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/