linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] debloat aic7xxx and aic79xx drivers by deinlining

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708302042260.24730@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:43:24 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	hare@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debloat aic7xxx and aic79xx drivers by deinlining


On Aug 28 2007 20:55, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> Fwiw I do like your debloat patch a lot; it's just only half the
>> equation ... if you also do the namespace fixes, I bet the driver
>> debloats even more...
>
>Yes, I know, and I am happy to do that too. I just don't know
>whether patches will be accepted.
>
>Why this patch is not commented on by scsi people?
>Am I sending patches to wrong people/lists?

Well, you can send it to Linus/Andrew, that will usually upset people and they
start commenting on it. Or they don't, and everything is fine.
(The "default y" approach so to speak ;-)


	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/