[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46D3C60B.3050605@vmware.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:51:55 -0700
From: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 16:25 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 08:34 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>> Zachary Amsden wrote:
>>>
>>>> This patch provides hypercalls for the i386 port I/O instructions,
>>>> which vastly helps guests which use native-style drivers. For certain
>>>> VMI workloads, this provides a performance boost of up to 30%. We
>>>> expect KVM and lguest to be able to achieve similar gains on I/O
>>>> intensive workloads.
>>>>
>>> Won't these workloads be better off using paravirtualized drivers?
>>> i.e., do the native drivers with paravirt I/O instructions get anywhere
>>> near the performance of paravirt drivers?
>>>
>> This patch also means I can kill off the emulation code in
>> drivers/lguest/core.c, which is a real relief.
>>
>
> Hrm... how do you deal with X doing IOs ?
>
> Ben.
>
We have an X driver that does minimal performance costing operations.
As we should and will have for our other drivers.
Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists