linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1188285159.6112.4.camel@twins>
Date:	Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:12:39 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SLUB use cmpxchg_local

On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 15:15 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Hmmmm. One wild idea would be to use a priority futex for the slab lock? 
> That would make the slow paths interrupt safe without requiring interrupt 
> disable? Does a futex fit into the page struct?

Very much puzzled at what you propose. in-kernel we use rt_mutex (has
PI) or mutex, futexes are user-space. (on -rt spinlock_t == mutex ==
rt_mutex)

Neither disable interrupts since they are sleeping locks.

That said, on -rt we do not need to disable interrupts in the allocators
because its a bug to call an allocator from raw irq context.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/