linux-kernel - Re: Heads Up: Next Batch Of Serial/TTY Changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070831231613.6b0fcdfd@the-village.bc.nu>
Date:	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:16:13 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Heads Up: Next Batch Of Serial/TTY Changes

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:11:05 +0100
> 
> > Firstly some architecture maintainers still haven't updated their
> > platform for arbitary tty speeds. The kernel is going to start whining
> > and issuing warnings on your platform if you don't keep up with the
> > programme (its been 6 months).
> 
> I took a look at this for sparc and I'm currently balking the same way
> you did :-) The current bit usage on sparc just don't work properly
> for what you're trying to do.

I don't see a real problem. You aren't using

	c_cflags & CBAUD = 0x00001000

so that could become BOTHER.

the input bits also appear to be reserved and free ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/