linux-kernel - Re: Heads Up: Next Batch Of Serial/TTY Changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46D89451.9050904@garzik.org>
Date:	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:21:05 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Heads Up: Next Batch Of Serial/TTY Changes

Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:41:15 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> 
>> From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
>> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:11:05 +0100
>>
>>> Firstly some architecture maintainers still haven't updated their
>>> platform for arbitary tty speeds. The kernel is going to start whining
>>> and issuing warnings on your platform if you don't keep up with the
>>> programme (its been 6 months).
>> I took a look at this for sparc and I'm currently balking the same way
>> you did :-) The current bit usage on sparc just don't work properly
>> for what you're trying to do.
> 
> I don't see a real problem. You aren't using
> 
> 	c_cflags & CBAUD = 0x00001000
> 
> so that could become BOTHER.

Pooh says:  oh, bother!

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/