linux-kernel - Re: maturity and status and attributes, oh my!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46D947A3.1000404@garzik.org>
Date:	Sat, 01 Sep 2007 07:06:11 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
CC:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: maturity and status and attributes, oh my!

Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
>> Feature deprecation and removal is a very amorphous concept that
>> does not fit well at all into Kconfig markers, unlike
>> experimental/broken.
> 
> and, as i've said before, i disagree.  while one might debate what

Feel free to disagree -- I am describing how things play out on a day to 
day basis.  In essence you are disagreeing with reality.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/