linux-kernel - Re: maturity and status and attributes, oh my!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709011514200.11617@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Sat, 1 Sep 2007 15:14:47 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
cc:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: maturity and status and attributes, oh my!


On Sep 1 2007 11:47, Stefan Richter wrote:
>Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> given the possible
>> interpretations of EXPERIMENTAL that i hadn't considered until now,
>> maybe it really *does* make sense to tag something as both
>> EXPERIMENTAL and, say, DEPRECATED (does it?).
>
>In theory maybe, for communication purposes perhaps rather not.

devfs would have been a good starting point for
EXPERIMENTAL && (DECPREATED || OBSOLETE).

>The reasoning why a feature is deprecated will typically include the
>gotchas which caused the feature to be considered experimental, if such
>gotchas still apply.


	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/