[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709030844250.4454@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 08:48:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <jsipek@...sunysb.edu>
cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org,
viro@....linux.org.uk, bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
j.blunck@...harburg.de, Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/32] Unionfs: cache-coherency - update inode times
On Sep 2 2007 22:20, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
>-static ssize_t unionfs_write(struct file * file, const char __user * buf,
>+
>+static ssize_t unionfs_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> {
> int err = 0;
>
> unionfs_read_lock(file->f_path.dentry->d_sb);
>-
> if ((err = unionfs_file_revalidate(file, 1)))
> goto out;
>
> err = do_sync_write(file, buf, count, ppos);
>+ /* update our inode times upon a successful lower write */
>+ if (err >= 0)
>+ unionfs_copy_attr_times(file->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
So, revisiting the question of inotifying, write() is indeed a case which
warrants notification (I think). Just was not sure what callers
unionfs_copy_attr_times can have.
>@@ -245,6 +245,12 @@ static struct dentry *unionfs_lookup(struct inode *parent,
> nd->dentry = path_save.dentry;
> nd->mnt = path_save.mnt;
> }
>+ if (!IS_ERR(ret)) {
>+ if (ret)
>+ dentry = ret;
>+ /* parent times may have changed */
>+ unionfs_copy_attr_times(dentry->d_parent->d_inode);
>+ }
On lookup? No inotify if you ask me...
>@@ -675,8 +681,11 @@ out:
>
> kfree(name);
>
>+ if (!err)
>+ unionfs_copy_attr_times(dentry->d_inode);
> unionfs_unlock_dentry(dentry);
> unionfs_read_unlock(dentry->d_sb);
>+
> return err;
> }
>
Can't decide ;-)
>@@ -1006,6 +1015,8 @@ static int unionfs_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask,
> break;
> }
> }
>+ /* sync times which may have changed (asynchronously) below */
>+ unionfs_copy_attr_times(inode);
>
> out:
> return err;
permission => readonly operation => no inotify
>diff --git a/fs/unionfs/unlink.c b/fs/unionfs/unlink.c
>index 822bffe..7ad19ec 100644
>--- a/fs/unionfs/unlink.c
>+++ b/fs/unionfs/unlink.c
>@@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ static int unionfs_unlink_whiteout(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
> dget(lower_dentry);
> if (!(err = is_robranch_super(dentry->d_sb, bindex)))
> err = vfs_unlink(lower_dir_dentry->d_inode, lower_dentry);
>+ /* if vfs_unlink succeeded, update our inode's times */
>+ if (!err)
>+ unionfs_copy_attr_times(dentry->d_inode);
> dput(lower_dentry);
> fsstack_copy_attr_times(dir, lower_dir_dentry->d_inode);
> unlock_dir(lower_dir_dentry);
unlink => write operation => inotify
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists