[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709030849260.4454@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 08:52:17 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <jsipek@...sunysb.edu>
cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org,
viro@....linux.org.uk, bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
j.blunck@...harburg.de, Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/32] Unionfs: cache-coherency - dentries
On Sep 2 2007 22:20, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
>@@ -184,10 +183,92 @@ out:
> }
>
> /*
>+ * Determine if the lower inode objects have changed from below the unionfs
>+ * inode. Return 1 if changed, 0 otherwise.
>+ */
>+int is_newer_lower(const struct dentry *dentry)
Could use bool and true/false as return value.
>-int __unionfs_d_revalidate_chain(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd)
>+int __unionfs_d_revalidate_chain(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd,
>+ int willwrite)
also looks like a bool (willwrite)
>- if (!__unionfs_d_revalidate_chain(dentry, NULL)) {
>+ if (!__unionfs_d_revalidate_chain(dentry, NULL, 0)) {
(Are there any callers with ,1?)
Jan
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists