[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1188929908.10802.113.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 04:18:17 +1000
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lguest <lguest@...abs.org>,
Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@...e.fr>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix out-by-one error in traps.c
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 11:24 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >
> > This is only for the initial booting stack (init_thread_union); see
> > arch/i386/kernel/head.S:
> > /* Set up the stack pointer */
> > lss stack_start,%esp
> > ...
> > pushl $0 # fake return address for unwinder
>
> Ok, we should fix that. We should just make it look like all other stack
> frames.
>
> There is other code in the kernel that "knows" that all kernel stacks have
> the fields for the user stack return on it, namely the ptrace code etc.
> Now, the initial stack is hopefully never *accessed* by that kind of code,
> but this kind of special-case code is just wrong.
Yes, but -ETIMEDOUT. Maybe for 2.6.24...
> IOW, how
> about this one, which just declares a structure that describes the stack
> frame thing? That just makes everything clearer, since we can then use
> "sizeof(that structure)" instead of using the magic "2*sizeof(unsigned
> long)".
Much nicer, thanks.
Rusty.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists