lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1188929908.10802.113.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 05 Sep 2007 04:18:17 +1000
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lguest <lguest@...abs.org>,
	Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@...e.fr>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix out-by-one error in traps.c

On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 11:24 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > 
> > This is only for the initial booting stack (init_thread_union); see
> > arch/i386/kernel/head.S:
> > 	/* Set up the stack pointer */
> > 	lss stack_start,%esp
> > 	...
> > 	pushl $0		# fake return address for unwinder
> 
> Ok, we should fix that. We should just make it look like all other stack 
> frames.
> 
> There is other code in the kernel that "knows" that all kernel stacks have 
> the fields for the user stack return on it, namely the ptrace code etc. 
> Now, the initial stack is hopefully never *accessed* by that kind of code, 
> but this kind of special-case code is just wrong.

Yes, but -ETIMEDOUT.  Maybe for 2.6.24...

> IOW, how 
> about this one, which just declares a structure that describes the stack 
> frame thing? That just makes everything clearer, since we can then use 
> "sizeof(that structure)" instead of using the magic "2*sizeof(unsigned 
> long)".

Much nicer, thanks.

Rusty.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ