[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1188932593.28903.357.camel@localhost>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 12:03:13 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Linux MM Mailing List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [-mm PATCH] Memory controller improve user interface (v3)
On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 16:20 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
>
> +Setting a limit to a number that is not a multiple of page size causes
> +rounding up of the value. The user must check back to see (by reading
> +memory.limit_in_bytes), to check for differences between desired values and
> +committed values. Currently, all accounting is done in multiples of PAGE_SIZE
I wonder if we can say this in a bit more generic fashion.
A successful write to this file does not guarantee a successful
set of this limit to the value written into the file. This can
be due to a number of factors, such as rounding up to page
boundaries or the total availability of memory on the system.
The user is required to re-read this file after a write to
guarantee the value committed by the kernel.
This keeps a user from saying "I page aligned the value I stuck in
there, no I don't have to check it."
-- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists