[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46DD0939.7030409@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:28:57 +0100
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM Mailing List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [-mm PATCH] Memory controller improve user interface (v3)
Paul Menage wrote:
> On 9/3/07, Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Paul Menage wrote:
>>> On 9/2/07, Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>> - s += sprintf(s, "%lu\n", *val);
>>>> + if (read_strategy)
>>>> + s += read_strategy(*val, s);
>>>> + else
>>>> + s += sprintf(s, "%lu\n", *val);
>>> This would be better as %llu
>>>
>> Hi, Paul,
>>
>> This does not need fixing, since the other counters like failcnt are
>> still unsigned long
>>
>
> But val is an unsigned long long*. So printing *val with %lu will
> break (at least a warning, and maybe corruption if you had other
> parameters) on 32-bit archs.
>
Yeah... Hmm.. just wonder if all the counters should be unsigned long
long? failcnt is the only remaining unsigned long counter now.
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists