linux-kernel - Re: udev: Inconsistency between %b and %p?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fbpsso$6bh$1@sea.gmane.org>
Date:	Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:59:10 +0200
From:	Manuel Reimer <Manuel.Spam@...fuerspam.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:  Re: udev: Inconsistency between %b and %p?

Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Manuel Reimer <Manuel.Spam@...fuerspam.de> writes:
> 
>> For me, this looks like a bug, or am I wrong?
> 
> It's a feature. It's documented.

man udev says:

| The name of the device matched while searching the devpath upwards
| for SUBSYSTEMS, KERNELS, DRIVERS and ATTRS.

What exactly does this mean?

Why should anyone need the name of a device, he didn't search for?

Could someone give me an example, where someone may be interested in an 
device name of an device, he just used, to narrow his rule to the one 
device, he is looking for.

Yours

Manuel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/