lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ae72650709061803u7ed2ff21v511f219e742ecd7a@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 7 Sep 2007 03:03:33 +0200
From:	"Kay Sievers" <kay.sievers@...y.org>
To:	"Manuel Reimer" <Manuel.Spam@...fuerspam.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: udev: Inconsistency between %b and %p?

On 9/6/07, Manuel Reimer <Manuel.Spam@...fuerspam.de> wrote:
> Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> As I would prefer to use the USB device information (idVendor, idProduct)
> >> to detect the device, I also tried this one:
> >>
> >> ATTRS{idVendor}=="0dda", ATTRS{idProduct}=="2005", SUBSYSTEM=="scsi",
> >> ACTION=="add", PROGRAM+="/usr/bin/test.sh %b %p"
> >>
> >> Now this version returns the USB device ID ($NUM-$NUM) to the test script,
> >> but the device path (%p) is still OK and still goes down up to the SCSI
> >> device ID.
> >>
> >> Why does %b not return the SCSI device ID in the second rule?
> >
> > Because ATTRS has matched the USB device, not the SCSI device.
>
> Yes, that's right, but "SUBSYSTEM" matched the SCSI device...
>
> If I use udevinfo, then this tool tells me:
>
> | A rule to match, can be composed by the attributes of the device
> | and the attributes from one single parent device.
>
> So I thought, that I've matched the SCSI device now. To prove this, I
> just replaced "SUBSYSTEM=="scsi"" with "SUBSYSTEM=="usb"" and removed
> the "S" in the "ATTRS" of the above rule, and now, I get the USB-device
> in %b (as expected) and the path in %p only goes down up to the USB
> device ID.
>
> So, if all rules match for the same device, then %b and %p are both
> pointing to this, right, device.
>
> If I try to match, using one of the parent devices (using the "S"
> "extension" to the property names) and the device, to match to, itself,
> then the two are inconsistent. Then, %b holds the device name of the
> parent and %p holds the patch of the device, I want to match.
>
> For me, this looks like a bug, or am I wrong?

It's fine. $id, like some other values too, is a value of the device
where all keys successful matched while walking up the chain of
devices.

Seems you are looking for the name of the device you received the
event for, so just use $kernel instead.

Kay
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ