[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070908113746.d4fceb87.francois.cami@free.fr>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 11:37:46 +0200
From: FD Cami <francois.cami@...e.fr>
To: Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@...il.com>,
charles gagalac <charles.gagalac@...il.com>,
daryll q <daryll_26m@...oo.com.ph>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Hang in 2.6.23-rc5
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 04:15:01 +0530 (IST)
Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >
> > Try this from net-2.6 tree:
> >
> > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> > @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static u32 tcp_rto_min(struct sock *sk)
> > struct dst_entry *dst = __sk_dst_get(sk);
> > u32 rto_min = TCP_RTO_MIN;
> >
> > - if (dst_metric_locked(dst, RTAX_RTO_MIN))
> > + if (dst && dst_metric_locked(dst, RTAX_RTO_MIN))
> > rto_min = dst->metrics[RTAX_RTO_MIN-1];
> > return rto_min;
> > }
>
> That's my impression as well. That's way too core/busy a codepath to
> have a bug in. As I said earlier, almost anybody testing -rc5 is sure
> to hit this within a few hours (probably less) -- sad, it greatly
> erodes from the usefulness of -rc5 as a release candidate.
For the record, I haven't been able to reproduce the lockup with this
patch.
Cheers
François
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists