[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070911021812.GA1544@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:18:12 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
Cc: Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc5: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 08:04:41PM -0400, jamal wrote:
>
> disabling BH would make it more symmetric to the way we handle
> egress. I couldnt reproduce the issue, but this should hopefully resolve
> it.
> Christian, can you test with this patch?
Jamal, it's the police_lock that we need to make _bh. The
ingress_lock is already _bh because of the spin_lock_bh that
directly precedes it.
Oh and I think the same thing applies for the other actions
too.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists