linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.23-rc5: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1189512106.4231.6.camel@localhost>
Date:	Tue, 11 Sep 2007 08:01:46 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc5: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected

On Tue, 2007-11-09 at 10:18 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:

> Jamal, it's the police_lock that we need to make _bh.  The
> ingress_lock is already _bh because of the spin_lock_bh that
> directly precedes it.
> 
> Oh and I think the same thing applies for the other actions
> too.

ga-Dang. Ok, here it is. If you see(?) any more farts let me know.
I am around for another 30 minutes and off for about 18 hours.

Christian, i took your config and qos setup but I cant reproduce the
issue - i think i may need some of that wireless setup to recreate. So
if you can test this and validate it works we can push it forward.

cheers,
jamal

View attachment "act_bhl" of type "text/plain" (2206 bytes)