[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200709112135.16639.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:35:15 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: clockevents: fix resume logic
On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 20:25, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:09:12 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 13:22, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:23:55 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 12:31, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:16:04 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 01:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:20:05 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:47:20 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 09:23 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > I went back to the original patch which I sent to Linus and it matches
> > > > > > > > > > > 18de5bc4c1f1f1fa5e14f354a7603bd6e9d4e3b6. So all I can think is that there
> > > > > > > > > > > must have been something else in the tree which I tested which fixed the
> > > > > > > > > > > bug which 18de5bc4c1f1f1fa5e14f354a7603bd6e9d4e3b6 introduced. argh.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Can you think what would cause the symptoms which I described?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It seems that time is not updated. Timer interrupt not active or some
> > > > > > > > > > other odd thing. I figure out what's going on when I find a box which
> > > > > > > > > > exposes the problem.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2.6.22-rc6-mm1's git-acpi.patch contains something which fixes this bug.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Len's current tree fixes it too.
> > > >
> > > > Do you mean this one:
> > > >
> > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git
> > >
> > > Nope.
> > >
> > > Here's the algorthm: go to the latest -mm tree and look at the first line
> > > of broken-out/git-acpi.patch:
> > >
> > > GIT f94aac9883f9b02700270cf286577a9bccf98f47 git+ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git#test
> > >
> > > that gives the URL, the branch and the top-level commit. All the -mm git
> > > trees have that first line.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Anyway, I was able to extract all the diffs and generate a patch series.
> > > The below patch fixes current mainline on the Vaio.
> >
> > It evidently assumes cpuidle to be present, which is not in the mainline.
>
> Bear in mind that the cpuidle patch fixes resume-from-ram when cpuidle is
> disabled in config.
>
> > It seems to me that the total effect of this one and the hackpatch is that
> > the C states are not handled any more.
>
> hm.
>
> dmesg without the cpuidle patch: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-bad.txt
> dmesg with the cpuidle patch: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-good.txt
> difference: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-diff.txt
>
> there doesn't seem to be a lot of difference in the time handling, except
> there are large changes in when things happen in the bootup sequence.
Hm, these things look like they may be related to the suspend/resume problems:
+Marking TSC unstable due to: possible TSC halt in C2.
+Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -458965792 ns)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists