[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070911123905.2508e4d2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:39:05 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: clockevents: fix resume logic
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:35:15 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > dmesg without the cpuidle patch: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-bad.txt
> > dmesg with the cpuidle patch: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-good.txt
> > difference: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-diff.txt
> >
> > there doesn't seem to be a lot of difference in the time handling, except
> > there are large changes in when things happen in the bootup sequence.
>
> Hm, these things look like they may be related to the suspend/resume problems:
>
> +Marking TSC unstable due to: possible TSC halt in C2.
>
> +Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -458965792 ns)
sort-of. But look:
akpm:/home/akpm> grep -i tsc dmesg-diff.txt
+Marking TSC unstable due to: possible TSC halt in C2.
+Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -458965792 ns)
-Marking TSC unstable due to: cpufreq changes.
-Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -150503296 ns)
the good and bad kernels seem to be doing quite similar things with the
time management. But they're doing it at quite different places in the
boot process.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists