[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46E7CC34.2060602@openvz.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:23:32 +0400
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
CC: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
Ron Minnich <rminnich@...dia.gov>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devel@...nvz.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5][9PFS] Use macro instead of explicit check for mandatory
locks
The __MANDATORY_LOCK(inode) macro makes the same check, but
makes the code more readable.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>
Cc: Ron Minnich <rminnich@...dia.gov>
Cc: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>
---
fs/9p/vfs_file.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_file.c b/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
index 2a40c29..7e75309 100644
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static int v9fs_file_lock(struct file *f
P9_DPRINTK(P9_DEBUG_VFS, "filp: %p lock: %p\n", filp, fl);
/* No mandatory locks */
- if ((inode->i_mode & (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) == S_ISGID)
+ if (__MANDATORY_LOCK(inode))
return -ENOLCK;
if ((IS_SETLK(cmd) || IS_SETLKW(cmd)) && fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK) {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists