linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/5][AFS] Use macro instead of explicit check for mandatory locks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46E7CD0B.6050008@openvz.org>
Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:27:07 +0400
From:	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	devel@...nvz.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5][AFS] Use macro instead of explicit check for mandatory
 locks

The __MANDATORY_LOCK(inode) macro makes the same check, but
makes the code more readable.

Unfortunately, I haven't found the maintainer for this FS in 
the MAINTAINERS file.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>

---

 fs/afs/flock.c |    3 +--
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/afs/flock.c b/fs/afs/flock.c
index af6952e..9ddac05 100644
--- a/fs/afs/flock.c
+++ b/fs/afs/flock.c
@@ -524,8 +524,7 @@ int afs_lock(struct file *file, int cmd,
 	       (long long) fl->fl_start, (long long) fl->fl_end);
 
 	/* AFS doesn't support mandatory locks */
-	if ((vnode->vfs_inode.i_mode & (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) == S_ISGID &&
-	    fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK)
+	if (__MANDATORY_LOCK(vnode->vfs_inode) && fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK)
 		return -ENOLCK;
 
 	if (IS_GETLK(cmd))

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/