[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46E7CD6C.7090105@openvz.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:28:44 +0400
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
CC: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devel@...nvz.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5][NFS] Use macro instead of explicit check for mandatory
locks
The __MANDATORY_LOCK(inode) macro makes the same check, but
makes the code more readable.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
---
fs/nfs/file.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c
index 73ddd2e..8dc2cde 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
@@ -605,8 +605,7 @@ static int nfs_lock(struct file *filp, i
nfs_inc_stats(inode, NFSIOS_VFSLOCK);
/* No mandatory locks over NFS */
- if ((inode->i_mode & (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) == S_ISGID &&
- fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK)
+ if (__MANDATORY_LOCK(inode) && fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK)
return -ENOLCK;
if (IS_GETLK(cmd))
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists