linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc: add new required termio functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:34:09 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	paulus@...ba.org, Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: add new required termio functions

On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 04:01:09AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:20:32 +0200 Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 12:04:39PM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > > The "tty: termios locking functions break with new termios type" patch
> > > (f629307c857c030d5a3dd777fee37c8bb395e171) breaks the powerpc compile.
> > > [...]
> > > I'm guessing other architectures are broken too?
> > 
> > FWIW, the above quoted patch breaks s390 as well.
> 
> Does this fix it?

I might be missing something, but the the right fix is probably to
apply the arch patches from Alan to powerpc and s390.  We don't want to
be left over without all the nice termios features on these platforms,
do we?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/