[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070912115257.GC7858@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:52:57 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
paulus@...ba.org, Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: add new required termio functions
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 12:34:09PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 04:01:09AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:20:32 +0200 Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 12:04:39PM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > > > The "tty: termios locking functions break with new termios type" patch
> > > > (f629307c857c030d5a3dd777fee37c8bb395e171) breaks the powerpc compile.
> > > > [...]
> > > > I'm guessing other architectures are broken too?
> > >
> > > FWIW, the above quoted patch breaks s390 as well.
> >
> > Does this fix it?
Yes, it does.
> I might be missing something, but the the right fix is probably to
> apply the arch patches from Alan to powerpc and s390. We don't want to
> be left over without all the nice termios features on these platforms,
> do we?
But not in rc6 timeframe, I would guess?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists