| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070914131003.71ba5ae4@the-village.bc.nu> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:10:03 +0100 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: Steven Toth <stoth@...ppauge.com> Cc: Markus Rechberger <mrechberger@...il.com>, Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@...il.com>, "video4linux-list@...hat.com" <video4linux-list@...hat.com>, "linux-dvb@...uxtv.org" <linux-dvb@...uxtv.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] [PATCH] Userspace tuner > > * Why did someone duallicense videodev2 with BSD/GPL? Originally the BSD people wanted to share the interface for user space compatibility. The kernel however is GPL so the BSD licence on some bits of the code isn't really relevant as the combination of bits you depend upon is GPL, will remain GPL and the only way to do a binary module would be to show it is not in any way a derivative work in law. > I know for certain that adding a userland API tuner/demod interface to > the kernel, allowing non-caring opportunistic silicon or board vendors > to developer closed source proprietary drivers, will have a negative > effect on the community and we'd set back linuxtv 3-5 years. Agreed entirely - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists