[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070914135237.GB19311@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:52:37 -0400
From: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
To: Markus Rechberger <mrechberger@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Toth <stoth@...ppauge.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"video4linux-list@...hat.com" <video4linux-list@...hat.com>,
"linux-dvb@...uxtv.org" <linux-dvb@...uxtv.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] [PATCH] Userspace tuner
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:17:05AM +0200, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> what stops vendors of using the current existing code to achieve that
> goal. They could provide binary drivers with the existing API.
If you feel lucky about the GPL
> What stops companies to intercept the ioctl calls and overriding some
> I2C commands?
The GPL - derivative work is the boundary not code linkage. Possibly a userspace
tuner hack would probably fit this too. Especially if a specific vendor is
producing both bits together and trying to claim they are independant.
> How about proprietary video formats, would you also place the decoding
> algorithms in kernel just to force companies to release their code
> for it?
No, I would assume they'd provide a proprietary conversion library that
no nobody would use (just like their hw). We keep format conversion firmly
seperated from hardware I/O processing.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists