linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm] mm: Fix memory hotplug + sparsemem build.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:09:27 -0400
From:	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] mm: Fix memory hotplug + sparsemem build.

On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 19:41 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:02:43 +0900 Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> > > >  	/* call arch's memory hotadd */
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > OK, we're getting into a mess here.  This patch fixes
> > > update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch, but which patch
> > > does update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch fix?
> > > 
> > > At present I just whacked
> > > update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch at the end of
> > > everything, but that was lazy of me and it ends up making a mess.
> > 
> > It is enough. No more patch is necessary for these issues.
> > I already fixed about Andy-san's comment. :-)
> 
> Now I'm more confused.  I have two separeate questions:
> 
> a) Is the justr-added update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd-fix.patch
>    still needed?
> 
> b) Which patch in 2.6.22-rc4-mm1 does
>    update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch fix?  In other
>    words, into which patch should I fold
>    update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch prior to sending
>    to Linus?

Andrew:  

I originally sent in the "update-n_high_memory..." patch against
23-rc3-mm1 on 27aug to fix a problem that I introduced when I moved the
populating of N_HIGH_MEMORY state to free_area_init_nodes().  This would
miss setting the "has memory" node state for hot added memory.  I never
saw any response, but then it ended up in 23-rc4-mm1.

This Tuesday, Paul Mundt sent in a patch to fix a build problem with
MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE introduced by my patch.  He replaced zone->node
with zone_to_nid(zone) in the node_set_state() arguments.

The latest patch, from Yasunori-san, I believe, starts kswapd for nodes
to which memory has been hot-added.  As I understand it, his is needed
because the memoryless nodes patch results in no kswapd for memoryless
nodes.

Does that help?

Lee


> 
>    (I (usually) get to work this out for myself.  Sometimes it is painful).
> 
> Generally, if people tell me which patch-in-mm their patch is fixing,
> it really helps.  Adrian does this all the time.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/