lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070914115045.F2EB.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:14:47 +0900
From:	Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] mm: Fix memory hotplug + sparsemem build.


> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:02:43 +0900 Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> > > >  	/* call arch's memory hotadd */
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > OK, we're getting into a mess here.  This patch fixes
> > > update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch, but which patch
> > > does update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch fix?
> > > 
> > > At present I just whacked
> > > update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch at the end of
> > > everything, but that was lazy of me and it ends up making a mess.
> > 
> > It is enough. No more patch is necessary for these issues.
> > I already fixed about Andy-san's comment. :-)
> 
> Now I'm more confused.  I have two separeate questions:
> 
> a) Is the justr-added update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd-fix.patch
>    still needed?

I'm not sure exact meaning of "just-added". 
But, update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd-fix.patch is
necessary for 2.6.23-rc4-mm1.

> b) Which patch in 2.6.22-rc4-mm1 does

                    2.6.23-rc4-mm1?

>    update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch fix?  In other
>    words, into which patch should I fold
>    update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch prior to sending
>    to Linus?

In my understanding, 
update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch should be folded
with all of memoryless-nodes-xxxxxxxxxxxx.patch.
It sets N_HIGH_MEMORY for a new node-with-memory.

But if you need specifing of more detail patch, becase N_HIGH_MEMORY is
set in memoryless-nodes-introduce-ask-of-nodes-with-memory.patch, 
I suppose update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch
should be fold with it.


update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd-fix.patch
                                                  ^^^
is fixes of update-n_high_memory-node-state-for-memory-hotadd.patch
and memoryless-nodes-no-need-for-kswapd.patch


Is it enough for your question? Or more confuse?


>    (I (usually) get to work this out for myself.  Sometimes it is painful).
> 
> Generally, if people tell me which patch-in-mm their patch is fixing,
> it really helps.  Adrian does this all the time.

Sorry for your confusing...


-- 
Yasunori Goto 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ