[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070915185020.16BB51F9EAA@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:50:21 -0700
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: cebbert@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Two identical entries for "rtc" in /proc/devices
> On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 18:23:22 -0400 Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > # ls -li
> > total 0
> > 4026532007 -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Sep 6 18:18 nvram
> > 4026532067 -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Sep 6 18:18 rtc
> > 4026532067 -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Sep 6 18:18 rtc
> > 4026532056 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Sep 6 18:18 snd-page-alloc
>
> Next -mm has
>
> procfs-detect-duplicate-names.patch
> procfs-detect-duplicate-names-fix.patch
> procfs-detect-duplicate-names-fix-fix-2.patch
>
> which will at least tell us who the second offender is.
Semes pretty clear that this must be procfs itself...
when a filesystem sees a name in a directory, it should
refuse to make another file with the same name. And it
should *never* reuse inode numbers...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists