[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070917200156.GA11814@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:01:56 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Rob Hussey <robjhussey@...il.com>, efault@....de,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ck@....kolivas.org
Subject: Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up
* Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 09:45:59PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> > The copy list, removed by Ingo is restored. Playing fair game, Willy!
>
> Sorry Oleg, I don't understand why you added me to this thread. And I
> don't understand at all what your intent was :-/
>
> I've left others Cc too since they wonder like me.
i'm wondering too.
in my posted debugging answer, instead of replying privately to Rob, i
have also Cc:-ed lkml and ck-list. (perhaps i shouldnt even have Cc:-ed
the lists, as my posted debugging questions and suggestions were mostly
relevant to Rob and to me - but it's better to keep such things archived
on the lists, if someone wants to read them. In the first mail i also
Cc:-ed Mike and Peter who changed the scheduler recently - but i dropped
them after my first reply when it became apparent that it's not their
changes that are affected. With all lists still Cc:-ed, so that people
can follow it if they really want to.)
I'd expect any new results to be posted by Rob to everyone he wishes to
send them to - like he did it in the past.
Or is Oleg perhaps complaining about the fact that i Cc:-ed this back to
both affected email lists, for everyone to read? Would be a weird
argument.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists