linux-kernel - Re: Scheduler benchmarks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070917200524.GA14523@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:05:24 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
Cc:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Rob Hussey <robjhussey@...il.com>, efault@....de,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ck@....kolivas.org
Subject: Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up


* Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 09:43:42PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 09:45:59PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> > > The copy list, removed by Ingo is restored. Playing fair game, Willy!
> > 
> > Sorry Oleg, I don't understand why you added me to this thread. And I
> > don't understand at all what your intent was :-/
> > 
> > I've left others Cc too since they wonder like me.
> 
> Why? Answer: <http://mid.gmane.org/20070913230836.GA16536@1wt.eu>
> 
> IMHO you shouldn't leave public lists in the reply like this. Whatever.

i'm even more confused. Could you please explain your point to me? I 
really cannot follow your argument. Thanks,

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/